I am agreeing with Hamilton. If you have issues then take them up with him. He stated his IDEA before my post and I am merely agreeing and asking the Devs to stay true to the game concepts that they have posted time and again.
Quit trying to pick a fight with me just because I don't agree with your ideas. I didn't see you take this approach after Hamilton's post. I won't participate in one and you are getting out of line pushing like this. Express your ideas but allow me to do the same.
I don't have to justify or explain anything to you. I don't agree and that is all that needs to be said. If a Dev asks me for something more that is different but you are, like me, a potential player and only expressing ideas, just as I am. The final decision is the Dev's, not you or me.
I will never agree with crowd control beyond what Hamilton has already outlined but you seem to ignore that fact in order to come after me. Hamilton's post is all the description that I need to offer for what I consider crowd control, again something that I have posted several times now. I suggest that you re-read it, again, and actually consider that to be my answer to ALL of your questions/concerns.
I have nothing more to add. Since my responses to you have not made that clear I will state it as clearly as possible now.
Have a nice day.
I don't care who you agree with, but turning you agreement into a passive aggressive load of crap is uncalled for.
it has nothing to do with you agreeing with my ideas or not, but the fact that all you do in this thread is say peoples ideas are crap without a reason why or alternatives, essentially a "your wrong for no other reason than because I way so", and I have no problem with people expressing themselves, my problem with you is how you go about doing it, without tact, respect, or consideration.
you right you don't have to justify or enplane anything to anyone, but not doing so is counterproductive, as it removes the ability for the person giving the idea or others to refine there ideas to make them suitable to all, so in essence it more detrimental to yourself who disagrees than to anyone else. It is the final decision of the Devs, however you seem to be putting a lot of words in there mouths by pretending to know exactly what there "vision" for the game is. why do you think they asked for our help in the first place? To improve upon that "vision".
you never said "NEVER" so I didn't have to ignore anything, but simply saying never is quite ignorant as you nor I nor anyone els can ever know every idea of everyone. So keep an open mind even if you dislike the current crop of ideas for crowd control
and try to be more respectful and tactful in your disagreements (seriously or I'll have to spam you with PMs reminding you